I have a secret for you:
I was creeped out by tonight's lecture by author Frank Warren.
The author, who has now created five books (best-sellers, as he frequently reminded us) from the project , was a bit confusing (or maybe just confused) on the intent of his project. Initially, and most obviously, his intent was to "collect secrets". Why? Because it's fun to know secrets. Somewhere between the music video and the book deal, however, the project became one intended to both bring the world closer together, as well as prevent suicide, a topic touched on repeatedly, but whose connection was only explained peripherally.
The questions of ethics and intent surrounding this project were so apparent that my sister and girlfriend were both kind of creeped out by Warren. The three of us (my sister's boyfriend seemed ambivalent) seemed to be the only ones, however. Warren's claims about the big idea behind the project, sharing secrets with the ones you love, no matter how small, to improve your relationship with them, seem to be contradicted not only by the content of the slides presented, but also by the project as a whole. People don't visit Warren's blog and read his books to better connect with the people sending in the postcards; they look at the postcards to see secrets that go near and over the line of taboo. They are in it to see some weird, wild stuff. Call me cynical, but I find it hard to give real consideration to Warren's supposed philosophy when the "big event" of the lecture was being allowed to see postcards that were "too controversial" to be put in his books. The sizzle of sensationalism is enough for me, but evidently Frank and his creepy cult of personality need bigger reasons to be interested in people's dirty laundry.
After showing us the cards we'd ALL BEEN WAITING TO SEE, there was an even more awkward Q&A&C session, the C meaning confession, where fine folks from the audience told their "secrets", to resounding applause from the audience and a vigorous round of Frank telling the person they were courageous, and then telling us as the audience that we are courageous for accepting and supporting the person, and then we, as the audience, applauding for Frank, for his courage in making this all possible, and WE ARE ALL GOOD PEOPLE YAY.
As the lecture ended with a video advertising Warren's FIVE BESTSELLING BOOKS and directing me to the booksigning in the lobby, where I could buy any or all of said books, I again questioned Warren's ethics. Even if I buy that the reason that Warren is sharing the secrets is to make the world a better place, the overt marketing behind the Post Secret phenomenon leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. I imagine the that the artists creating the postcards would probably put a "Non-Commercial" license on their works, if they had the mind or means to do so. No one, however, brought up the fact that Warren is not merely collecting secrets (and works of art), but is trading in them.
The picture from the poster, looking like a gangsta.
The real Frank Warren. Selling your secrets because he cares.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
hi,
ReplyDeleteI actually appreciate your thoughtful post. I am going to come back and read it again more carefully.
-Frank
What do you think of Gillian Wearing's project "Confess all on video. Don't worry, you'll be in disguise." Warren assumes the secrets are real; there is an undercurrent of the self-help secular religion. Wearing admits the possibility of lying to her and oneself.
ReplyDeletePerhaps there are deeper layers than simply true and false when you are talking about a secret - a self revelation.
ReplyDeleteI think Hemingway said, "The best stories are more true than if they actually happened".
I have heard from people, "mailing you a secret was a way for me to 'come out to myself'."
-F
I agree that "sharing secrets with the ones you love, no matter how small, to improve your relationship with them" does not seem to be a part of PostSecret's immediate function. Although Frank has mentioned here the "self revelation", which is presented in a completely anonymous way - in the mail, and online (and eventually, as Josh mentioned, co-opted in the form of a marketable product). So, in a sense, "sharing" becomes sharing only with yourself (self-help), and I would almost say this reinforces the idea of holding a secret. Does sharing a secret in this way, no matter how constructed, do anything to benefit the way we connect with others? PostSecret doesn't seem like a vehicle for changing the way people connect, but rather a gesture that reinforces the way we often fail to connect. I think the ethical concerns Josh mentioned are quite valid, in terms of selling the anonymous secrets of others.. I would be interested to hear how Frank deals with this issue (that apparently does not come up in the lectures).
ReplyDeleteAs far as "selling the anonymous secrets of others" and the ethical issues behind that controversy goes, the fact of the matter is that people make the choice to participate or not...It seems like every other discussion group on the internet where we often 2, 3, 10 times a day give out our free information to the WWW. Rarely are people aware that their opinions are being surveilled and manipulated specifically for the good of marketing and capitalism...that is the society we live in. So I guess it just seems to come down to awareness and choice. Secrets are secrets...the moment you decide to share them, they no longer are secrets. Whether you need to disclose them is definitely a personal choice, however, this does not mean that good will come from it. Ideas of confession have been around for centuries...which is probably why the Q&A&C session was awkward...stumbling across a lecture in an educational institution to blindly find out you are participating in some sort of religious confession could be a bit out of one's expectations.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the public confession goes, It also is completely in conflict with the "anonymous" nature of the postcards. That was partially what bothered me about that aspect of the "event".
ReplyDeleteIn reference to the nature of Post Secret as a commodity, I think that there should be a distinction made that is indeed being sold. Post Secret could, and temporarily did, exist as a non-commercial product. The Creative Commons ideas of letting people use your work as part of a project, but not a product, would seem to fit with Post Secret's philosophy, and the books are not necessary for the project to exist. I also wonder about the postcards becoming SOMEONE's intellectual property, as I imagine that someone must own the rights once they are published in the book, whether it be the publishing company or Frank Warren and I imagine neither of the two parties would agree to "share-alike".
Perhaps you can tell me more about that, Frank?